1 in 81

The message you never want to get from your midwife is the one where she says “I received the results of your second trimester screen.  Please give me a call back as soon as possible.”

When I was 17 weeks pregnant with Anna I got that very message.  I was sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic on the 105 freeway, checking my voice mail on my way home from work.  I looked out of my window at a sea of unknown faces in the cars around me, surrounded by people, yet utterly alone.

When I was finally able to speak with my midwife she explained that the blood work that I had submitted the week previous, a routine second trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities and birth defects had returned a much higher than normal risk for Down Syndrome.  Specifically, my baby’s risk of Down Syndrome had been calculated to be 1 in 81, as compared to the risk based on my age of 1 in 769.  It’s easy to complain about the nausea, the unflattering maternity clothes, the fatigue of pregnancy.  But all those complaints pale in compassion to the fear that your child might not be healthy.

When I was pregnant with Theodore we received a slightly anomalous result on a first trimester screening test.  It was unclear whether the anomaly was statistically significant and after speaking with a genetic counselor, who believed that our baby had no increased risk of problems, we declined to pursue further testing.  But that potential anomaly opened up a can of worms that has wriggled about Jeff and I ever since.  The anxiety over that one slightly anomalous test colored the rest of my pregnancy with Theodore and was a major factor in the horrible prenatal and postpartum depression I experienced.

The first and second trimester screening programs are subsidized by the state of California.  My midwife explained that, as such, the state would pay for me to undergo further testing, a high level ultrasound and an amniocentesis, given my baby’s highly elevated risk of Down Syndrome.  I made the soonest available appointment with the recommended perinatologist, an agonizing wait of one week after my midwife’s initial call.  That week found me sobbing every night into my midnight snack as Jeff and had painful, gut-wrenching discussions about what was an acceptable amount of risk to the baby and under which circumstances we might terminate a pregnancy.  You see, ultrasound is 100% safe for the baby yet does not provide a definitive answer.  The best we could hope for with an ultrasound was that approximately 70% of babies with Down Syndrome show muscular-skeletal, gastrointestinal, and/or cardiovascular anomalies during the scan.  Amniocentesis, on the other hand, is nearly 100% definitive, but carries a risk of miscarriage somewhere under half of a percent, depending on the skill of the physician performing the procedure as well as other factors.   Jeff and I asked the same questions over and over:  What was the actual risk of amniocentesis for our baby?  What would it really be like to raise a child with Down Syndrome?  What effect would a sibling with Down Syndrome have on Thomas and Theodore?  Our midwife, our obstetrician, even the internet couldn’t give us the answers.  And, of course, as we had these literal life or death discussions I felt our baby moving innocently, within me.  Initially we found ourselves agreeing that we didn’t think we could parent a child with Down Syndrome.  Prior to actually being confronted with this situation I had thought that I would opt for the amniocentesis and that if the diagnosis was indeed Down Syndrome, that we would end the pregnancy.  But over the week Jeff and I found our thoughts evolving together.  I focused on two questions:  Was there any risk level for amniocentesis that would ever be acceptable to me?  I could only imagine the absolute horror of our baby losing their life as the result of a procedure that I chose to have.  And would our child and our family suffer if our son or daughter had Down Syndrome.  Without a doubt Down Syndrome would be a huge challenge; it would alter the course of all of our lives.  But, in the end, Jeff and I came to the conclusion that we wouldn’t suffer and that our child wouldn’t either.  The truth is that parenting is a crapshoot; I felt that when we chose to have children we chose to take on whatever those children might be and the joy and pain of being their parents.  I would never let a child of mine or our family knowingly suffer, but for us Down Syndrome didn’t meet that definition.  And if ever there was a time that I was thankful to have married someone that shares the same values as I did, it was in facing a negative prenatal diagnosis.  Jeff and I were completely in agreement.  We would take the ultrasound and leave the amniocentesis.  We would hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

On the appointed day we drove to our appointment with the perinatolgist.  When we arrived I realized that it was 2:00 in the afternoon and I hadn’t eaten anything all day.  The hunger combined with my nominal pregnancy nausea along with the mounting anxiety made me feel quite physically ill.  I kept thinking that I would take the pain of labor any day over the feeling in that waiting room.  After a session with a genetic counselor we were finally granted the ultrasound.  Our baby appeared on a huge LCD display across the room.  He or she wriggled and kicked; looking for all the world like a perfectly healthy baby. Being my third child and somewhere around my 30th ultrasound I knew what I would see on the screen but I found my breath catch at how only 18 weeks into pregnancy the baby on the screen looked like the tiny person that he or she already was.  Although it was clear that at level of detail we would easily be able to determine the baby’s gender we opted not to find out at that moment.  I wanted the reveal of whether or not we were having a son or a daughter to be a purely happy moment.  When the ultrasound came to the part of the anatomy that would give things away I closed my eyes and the ultrasound technician wrote down our baby’s gender on a card and placed it in a sealed envelope.  After a long 45 minute scan by a technician, the perinatolgist came in and performed a second scan.  Both scans showed a perfectly healthy baby.  The perinatolgist told us that given the ultrasound our baby’s risk of Down Syndrome was now improved from the 1 in 81 although he couldn’t say by how much.

We drove home quietly, knowing that we would somehow have to sit with the unknown for the next 22 weeks, but sure that our decision, not to know, had been the only one we could live with.   And then we decided to go out to dinner and open the envelope.  Over a plate of focaccia I opened the card and read “Girl!” and in that moment my anxiety melted away and I was simply giddy with excitement.

Almost no one knew of our concerns. As sure as I was that our decision was the right one for us, I could not stand to hear any questions.  I could not stomach the thought of the inevitable comments along the line of “My sister’s roomate’s cousin has Down Syndrome and he/she is the happiest person in the world or made his/her family’s life hell.”  I could not bear the thought that this dearly loved little girl could actually have Down Syndrome.

There have been a number of pieces of recent legislation in several states that would limit the rights of women to know about potentially negative prenatal diagnoses or to act upon that information.  Such laws will not save babies and families they will potentially destroy them.  Knowing about problems before the baby is born can save the life of the baby.  Knowing about problems can save a family as well.  Not everyone feels the same way about what constitutes suffering and everyone’s family is different in their ability to handle a child with significant challenges.  We did not know definitively if our daughter had Down Syndrome or not; but we choose that ignorance with the knowledge that we would accept and still be able to lead a happy life even in the face of such adversity.  These laws have been framed as being part of a “war on women”.  They are not simply anti-woman, but anti-father, anti-child, and anti-family.

When imagining our daughter’s birth I had thought that the first thing I would do after she was born would be to look her over in great detail searching for signs that anything might be amiss.  Instead I found myself flooded with relief that she had simply been born.  I was overcome with love for our daughter and just like her brothers before her I simply nursed her and held her close, never waiting to let her go. Nearly five months after her birth it is clear that Anna does not have Down Syndrome.  I am incredibly grateful that Anna is perfectly healthy.  And I am incredibly grateful that I had the right to choose to know what I needed to about her health before she was born and the right to act (or not act) on that information.

5 Responses to “1 in 81”

  1. Jane Says:

    Well said, and important to say.

  2. PAPA Dave Says:

    Gina at first I was not sure how to post a comment on you post. 1st off I am sorry both Mom and I could not be there to support you at that time. This was a burden to you and Jeff and even the boys. While Mom and I always worried about the 3 of you when you all going to be born with the hope you would all be healthy and have all your eyes, ears toes and all else, I am not sure we could have been up to the worry the test revelaed to you.
    I guess I just wanted to say that we would have supported any decision that you and Jeff and would have made and then have been there to help in what ever way you had needed. I never knew about this until I read your blog last night. I am of course happy that ANNA is who she is. I do feel like you that you have a right to choose what would be right for your family or for any family. When you and Tony and Sara were coming into this world there were not tests and scans like there are now and we never did know if it was a boy or a girl. Just know that we love you, Jeff and the boys and litle Anna and are here for you all you have to do is call. Love teary eyed PaPa Dave

  3. Jenna Says:

    Beautifully, and powerfully, said. Thank you.

  4. Karen Says:

    Beautiful post Gina. A parent’s anxiety begins well before birth. This is such a difficult subject to talk about. Here is an article that was in Time magazine recently about Down’s: http://healthland.time.com/2012/02/17/why-down-syndrome-is-on-the-decline/). I have sort of a different take on this – I am not so steadfast that parents have a right to know about negative prenatal diagnoses. There are several, like Down’s, that are easily identifiable however many (most?) are not. I have a cousin with a Down’s-like trisomy and a close friend whose daughter turned out to have major neurological problems and neither was detected prenatally – my aunt was not a candidate for anything but standard screenings of the 1980′s and my friend’s daughter showed no signs of a problem except that she seemed unable to suck and swallow. 

    I am concerned that the issue of women’s right to access information that affects us and our children is crowding out the discussion of how much genetic testing ought to be available. If the right to know is more important than the ethics of determining what ought to be known, then where does the testing and information end? Just with traditional screenings for Downs? Mainly I think the issue is getting information to parents when there is still enough time to terminate the pregnancy. Sex selection is extreme but my solidly pro-choice OB is up in arms over newer tests that are available in the Internet that promise parents an accurate sex ID within the first trimester through a blood test.   If we expand testing for identifiable problems like Down’s (though as the Time article points out the amnio cannot determine the severity, only the presence), then does our society move a bit closer to complete marginalization of those whose problems were not evident at a time when their parents could have ended the pregnancy? And if testing is made available for less obvious problems but with a lower rate of accuracy do we increase the number of women enduring this terrible anxiety that you faced, not knowing until their child is born whether the baby is ok? Is that progress? In a perfect world our advanced, enlightened society would find a way to fund the services and support that families need to care for those who cannot live independently but alas that is not the case. 

    I dunno, sorry to hijack your post. You write such interesting and thought provoking topics. 

  5. Gina Says:

    @Dad, I think dealing with other people’s worry would have been very difficult for us to deal with which is one reason we didn’t talk about it. But don’t worry that we didn’t feel supported. Honestly, Jeff and I were wonderful support to each other and that was all we really needed.

    @Karen, Thanks for the link to the TIME article. The situation described in the article – where the Dr. says “I’m sorry” was one reason we chose to continue with a homebirth. Down Syndrome or not I wanted to celebrate Baby Girl’s birth and I knew our midwife would do that. (Given that the baby looked physically healthy on the ultrasound we did have our OB’s blessing for a homebirth – that would not have been appropriate had the baby had gastrointestinal or cardiovascular challenges). The issue of genetic testing definitely deserves another post. I have significant concerns about how the testing is basically standard for all pregnant women with no discussion of the risk and anxiety due to false screen-positives. I also take issue with the typical medical point of view that Down Syndrome is something to test for so that one can terminate the pregnancy. There is a definite bias towards termination. Like you said, I wish that people could make the determination of what is right for their family with the background that there were social services to support the families if they choose to continue the pregnancy but a perfect system certainly does not exist. And just as you said, testing is no guarantee that your child will be “perfect”. The old saying that being a parent is having your “heart walking around outside of your body” is so true. When you take the plunge of becoming a parent you take the risk of having your heart broken.