Change of the Week: Less (Laundry) is More

Sometimes I think about how I can make a big impact on the problems of the world; that perhaps I could be a catalyst for a societal change to a lower energy, low consumption, more satisfied, happier future.

And sometimes I’ve got to do laundry.

With three young children, a big garden (complete with what are apparently very inviting muddy paths), using cloth in place of paper towels, and cloth diapers we do a lot of laundry in our house.  While I may not care all that much for such modern technologies like cell phones, modern high efficiency washing machines are truly awesome.  A couple of years ago I read Opal Whitley’s hauntingly beautiful, The Singing Creek Where the Willows Grow.  (Aside:  if you have not read this book go put it on your to read list right now.  It is stunning and truly unlike anything else I have ever read.)  Amongst all of Opal’s magical descriptions of nature I was also fascinated by the glimpses that she offered into everyday life in the 1890s.  Reading her mentions of boiling cloth diapers in a pot of water on the stove to clean them made me truly appreciate how wonderful and time saving the modern washing machine is.  Can you imagine washing cloth diapers by hand?  Shudder.

That same time savings afforded by a washing machine does, however, have its downside.  Because it doesn’t take me all day to wash one “load” of clothes we can (and do) have far more clothes.  On top of that our standards of cleanliness can (and are) much higher.  Smeared a little mud on my sweatshirt, then throw it in the wash.  Kids wiped their nose on their sleeve – into the hamper it goes.  Meant to flour the table while making bread but floured my pants instead – no problem for the washing machine.  Of course, all that time savings from the magical machine isn’t free, we pay for it in detergent, water and electricity, and eventually we pay for it in repairs and new washer.  Every load of laundry I do adds a little bit more CO2 to the atmosphere and uses up another few drops of oil.  I’m not about to parade around in smelly, gray clothes but I know that we have become quite lax about truly evaluating what we are wearing and using and whether or not it is really dirty.   Take for example, little kid undershirts.  The boys barely even sweat- those shirts are perfectly fine to wear again.  And if I haven’t been outside all day do I really need to change my socks before I go to bed?  I could certainly hang up my towel after drying my hair rather than toss it in the hamper.  And I have a lovely little selection of vintage aprons to choose from to minimize the inevitable flour on my pants problem.

I’ve also noticed that I use more laundry detergent for each of these many loads than I need to.  Perhaps I am getting old and in need of reading glasses or perhaps the detergent manufactures want me to use excessive amounts of soap (cleanliness conspiracy!), but I find it really hard to see that little line on the detergent cap that indicates how much detergent one is supposed to use.  I inevitably just slosh some detergent into the machine using more than I need.  I also think that some primitive part of my brain thinks something like this:   soap = clean and clean = good so more soap = more clean. This is, of course, nonsense; more soap just means I use up the soap faster and possibly even end up with slippery clothes that don’t have all the soap rinsed out of them.

So this week I resolved to think about each item before it goes into the laundry.  We all have hooks on teh backs of our bedroom doors and the bathroom door and we are going to use them to hang up clothese that can be worn again.  I got a red sharpie and drew a bold, unmissable, circle around the detergent cap so that I had no excuse for overuse.  I decided to try washing everything but diapers and sheets on the shortest, cold wash cycle only to see if that works just fine.  I am looking forward to our next water and electric bill and hopefully will see some savings in energy and money.  Maybe I can even get back a tiny sliver of time spent hauling clothes to the washing machine, hanging them up to dry, and putting them away.  And we all know that free time is priceless.  In this case, less is more.

5 Responses to “Change of the Week: Less (Laundry) is More”

  1. Jen Says:

    I have switched to using Charlie’s detergent – I like that it is way more environmentally friendly (you can find on amazon or in some grocery stores). I use the regular detergent and add in a little of the laundry booster as I found some stains weren’t getting removed as well as with the usual kinds of detergents, and since then I’ve had no problem. I also do all my laundry loads on cold (except for towels sometimes). So that helps me feel a little better about the environmental impact of my dirty clothes! Good luck with your changes!

  2. BV Says:

    All things considered, it is a bit surprising how many times a pair of jeans can be worn before they absolutely must go into the wash. Our choice to launder less was not directly attributed to our roles as stewards of this great planet. We just grew tired of a 4-5 load week. We rarely use any water temperature other than cold or launder our clothes on any wash cycle other than the shortest one. We do use several different environmentally friendly detergent brands. Since the cleaning quality is pretty consistent, we just let pricing dictate what we purchase. When we use the dryer, it’s either the air dry or low setting; only medium heat if we’re pressed for time. I have considered installing an outdoor clothes line but I haven’t taken that plunge just yet. Your changes might not seem like much now but the most immediate impact will be on your family. That’s what happened in our house. The less laundry sorting, soaking, folding and organizing we had to do gave us an unexpected gift: more free time to be with each other.

  3. Tiffany Says:

    We are not big fans of ironing in our house and prefer the “fluff” method which means that we run our dryer everyday. I’m sure it’s not the best for the enviroment but if it means that I get five more minutes of sleep then I’m okay with it.

  4. Gina Says:

    FYI: we have this clothesline installed on the west (sunny) side of our house: http://www.clotheslinesource.com/clotheslines/wall-mount-clotheslines/whitneydesigns7lineindooroutdoorstowawayclothesline.cfm

    I love it. It holds about 1.5 loads of laundry and folds out of the way when not in use.

    @Tiffany, We are definitely not fans of ironing here either. I try to buy clothes that don’t need it and I find that when I hang my clothes to dry on the clothes line they come out looking pretty nice. I actually can’t remember the last time I ironed – I am sure it’s been months!

  5. Karen Says:

    You know what is a built-in pushback to doing laundry? Having to walk out your back door, around the side of the house, into the garage, and around your car to access the W/D. Sheesh! It’s just barely one level above going to the freakin’ laundromat.

    I was a major laundry pincher when I lived in my apartment. Nothing like paying $0.75 to wash and $1.25 to dry the equivalent of 3/4 of a full load to make you question your laundry choices. I am still so scarred by that experience that I still think about every piece that goes in the hamper, but don’t hesitate to throw in clothes that have been worn all day or have food on them now that my laundry is “free”. We use Charlie’s and Rockin Green (hard to overuse since it’s a tablespoon of powder). Our home water consumption is driven by irrigation (which we do very little of) rather than washing clothes (including diapers)/dishes/or showers and our electricity/gas is negligible and the biggest culprit is our uninsulated house. For us, laundry is in the noise.

    My parents line dried all of our clothes and laundry growing up and I was always so embarrassed to wear things with clothes-pin marks and clothes-line creases, and they were always sort of stiff and would often get a bit wonky shaped if they didn’t hang perfectly (t-shirt longer on one side). I just can’t do it.